COMMISSION 27 AND 42 OF THE IAU INFORMATION BULLETIN ON VARIABLE STARS Number 3803 Konkoly Observatory Budapest 12 November 1992 HU ISSN 0374 - 0676 NEW PHOTOELECTRIC MINIMA TIMES OF V505 SAGITTARII In a recent report (Rovithis-Livaniou et al., 1991) the behaviour of the period of the eclipsing binary V505 Sagittarii was studied and new ephemeris formulae were proposed. Since most of the recent minima times were visual - exhibiting large scattering - we had call for new (and especially photoelectric) minima times. This was done during our recent observations of V505 Sgr, which were made using the 48 inch Cassegrain reflector at the Kryonerion Astronomical Station of the National Observatory of Athens, Greece. The star HD 187664 was used for comparison and reduction of the observations was made in the usual way (Hardie, 1962). During our observations three minima times were obtained and are presented in Table I, the successive columns of which give: the Hel. JD; the (O-C)_C according to the linear ephemeris of Chambliss (1972); the (O-C)_M according to Kholopov's et al. (1985) ephemeris formula and finally (O-C)_R1 and (O-C)_R2 according to our linear ephemeris formulae. (Equations (1.5) and (1.7) in Rovithis-Livaniou et al., 1991). Table 1 Hel. JD (O-C)_c (O-C)_M (O-C)_R1 (O-C)_R2 432.4871 0.0199 -0.0034 +0.0007 0.0013 442.5402 0.0189 -0.0047 -0.0006 0.0000 804.4984 0.0195 -0.0052 -0.0004 0.0001 From the values of both (O-C)_R1 and (O-C)_R2 it is obvious that the proposed new ephemeris formulae hold good. But if one wants to have a more accurate view and adds the 3 new minima times - given in Table I - to those of Chambliss (1972) and Rovithis-Livaniou et al., (1991), then some minor variations are found, thus: Chambliss' (1972) linear ephemeris formula is improved to: Min I = 2425501.3811 + 0.182869342d x E (1.1) while Kholopov's et al. (1985) to: Min I = 2444461.5929 + 0.18286938d x E (1.2) continuing their changes. Moreover, since there are only 3 secondary minima times for V505 Sgr in the literature, and the scatter in the primaries is too large, one cannot examine them separately now. Concluding, we ask for more accurate (photoelectric) minima times - both primaries and secondaries - which together with more data for the third companion (e.g. Khalesseh and Hill, 1991; Tomkin, 1992) will lead to the evaluation of the light-time effect which must be removed from the (O-C) diagram of V505 Sagittarii. H. ROVITHIS-LIVANIOU Section of Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanics, University GR 157 84 Zografos Athens, Greece P. ROVITHIS Astronomical Institute National Observatory of Athens P.O. Box 20048 11810 Athens, Greece References: Chambliss, C.R., 1972, Astron. J. 77, 672. [BIBCODE 1972AJ.....77..672C ] Hardie, R.H., 1962, in W.A. Hiltner (Ed.), "Stars and Stellar Systems" Vol. II, Astronomical Techniques, The University Chicago Press, Chicago. Khalesseh, B. and Hill, G., 1991, Astron. Astroph. 244, 75. [BIBCODE 1991A&A...244...75K ] Kholopov, P.N. et al., 1985, Fourth Edition of the General Catalogue of Variable Stars, Moscow. Rovithis-Livaniou, H., Antonopoulou, E., Rovithis, P. and Kalimeris, A., 1991, IBVS No. 3608. Tomkin, J., 1992, Astrophys. J. 387, 631. [BIBCODE 1992ApJ...387..631T ]