COMMISSIONS 27 AND 42 OF THE IAU INFORMATION BULLETIN ON VARIABLE STARS Number 3782 Konkoly Observatory Budapest 2 October 1992 HU ISSN 0374 - 0676 THE STELLAR SYSTEM AW Cam The star AW Cam, originally named BV 412, was discovered as a variable star by Strohmeier, Knigge and Ott (1963). The Cracovian Annual for 1992 describes it as a 8.0 magnitude star, with minima of amplitude 0.35m and 0.06m respectively. Photometrically and spectroscopically it is considered that the principal minimum is a transit. The spectral classes of the two components are A0V and F2. The bigger star is also the hotter. The Seventh Catalogue of the Orbital Elements of Spectroscopic Binary Systems presents its orbit as an elliptical one with: omega = 10deg and e = 0.12. This star was introduced in our observational program because until now the light curve determination has been very poor and the elements computed are not very accurate. Our observations are performed at Bucharest Observatory with a 50cm Cassegrain telescope using an EMI 9502B photomultiplier. The numbers of the observational points are 371 in U, 372 in B and 403 in V filters respectively. Using the ephemeris: P = 2438738.4522d + 0.7713468d x E two minima were calculated. The O-C values obtained are respectively: Julian Date O-C Min Filter 2445408.2819 -0.0061 I V 2447972.2460 +0.0013 I V We used a Wood model for the determination of the elements the system. Because the observational scatter is large, we have used an "alternate directions" method for light curve solution with six steps in computation. In the first two steps, we try to obtain solutions using two different routes to perform the differential corrections on the mathematical hypersurface. (i, omega, e, a_1, k, u_2, T_2) of the solution: [(i, a_1, k, T_2) (omega, e)] and [(omega, e) (i, a_1, k, T_2)], respectively, for calculating the influence of the pair (omega, e). The values obtained by two different routes are partly different from those given by Batten et al. (1978). [FIGURE 1] Figure 1. AW Cam B filter; lines - model 1, 2; pluses - obs. points [FIGURE 2] Figure 2. AW Cam V filter; lines - model 1, 2; pluses - obs. points [FIGURE 3] Figure 3. AW Cam U filter; lines - model 1, 2; pluses - obs. points The next steps were taken by an alternation of [(u_2, T_2), (i, a_1, k, T_2)] calculations. During this process two "relative minima" were found, with practically the same Summa (O-C)^2 = 0.05 values. The larger scatter of the observed light curve does not permit us to discriminate better between these two solutions. The results for the two minima in B filter are: ELEMENT SOLUTION 1 SOLUTION 2 B B i 78.3 78.2 e sin omega 0.071 0.095 e cos omega 0.040 0.046 u_1 0.6 0.6 u_2 0.3 0.28 a_1 0.36 0.376 k 0.55 0.537 beta_1 0.25 0.25 beta_2 0.25 0.25 T_1 9520 9520 T_2 5030 4687 q 0.5 0.5 Summa(O-C)^2 0.053 0.052 The observational UBV data will be published in Romanian Astronomical Journal. Gabriella OPRESCU and Marian Doru SURAN Astronomical Institute of the Romanian Academy Cutitul de Argint 5, 75212 Bucharest 28, Romania References: Strohmeier, W., Knigge, R., Ott, H., 1963, Veroff. Remeis-Sternwarte Bamberg, V, No. 16 Batten, A. H. et al., 1978, Seventh Catalogue of the Orbital Elements of Spectroscopic Binary Systems, Publ. Dom. Astrophys. Obs., 15, No. 5 [BIBCODE 1978coes.book.....B ]