COMMISSION 27 OF THE I. A. U. INFORMATION BULLETIN ON VARIABLE STARS Number 3596 Konkoly Observatory Budapest 3 May 1991 HU ISSN 0374 - 0676 NEW PERIOD FOR GS Cep The eclipsing binary GS Cep (BD +57d2885) has been observed photoelectrically at the N. Copernicus Observatory and Planetarium in Brno with a 40 cm reflector. As already noted by Hanzl (1990), most of the minima as predicted by the ephemeris given in GCVS (Pri.Min. = HJD 2426350.375 + 0.772002d*E did not appear. It was only possible to satisfy the measurements from the years 1988 and 1989 with a different period, the preliminary value of which was 1.47162d [please note that the date in Hanzl (1990), Table II, should read 715 instead of 716]. In order to check the new period, recent measurements have been done during this year in V and B colours (by D.H.). The results obtained are given in Table 1 (where also the times of minima as reported by Hanzl (1990) are repeated). A new ephemeris was calculated using LSM: Pri.Min. = HJD 2447414.4350 + 1.471625d*E +-28 +-6 Table 1 Photoelectric Data Time of minimum Filter Epoch O - C HJD 2440000+ 7414.4346 V 0 -.0004 .4346 B -.0004 .4359 U +.0009 7776.4546 V 246 -.0002 .4539 B -.0009 8060.4838 V 439 +.0054 .4845 B +.0061 8085.4996 V 456 -.0024 .4936 B -.0024 8088.4365 V 458 -.0027 .4358 B -.0034 8102.4205 V 467.5 +.0008 .4198 B +.0001 Table 2 Sonneberg Plates HJD HJD 2400000+ Epoch O-C 2400000+ Epoch O-C 38242.524 -6232.5 -.007 41593.459 -3955.5 .032 38371.271 -6145.0 -.029 41596.385 -3953.5 .019 38410.297 -6118.5 -.001 41604.449 -3948.0 -.011 38557.507 -6018.5 .047 42306.408 -3471.0 -.017 38579.531 -6003.5 -.003 42359.363 -3435.0 -.040 38649.375 -5956.0 -.062 42601.506 -3270.5 .021 38813.272 -5844.5 -.240 42713.362 -3194.5 .033 39025.441 -5700.5 .004 42807.268 -3130.5 -.244 39053.389 -5681.5 -.009 42988.506 -3007.5 -.017 39059.378 -5677.5 .094 43008.394 -2994.0 .004 39063.395 -5674.5 -.303 43016.490 -2988.5 .006 39145.368 -5619.0 -.006 44116.492 -2241.0 -.030 39331.534 -5492.5 -.001 44195.280 -2187.5 .025 39359.469 -5473.5 -.027 44456.446 -2010.0 -.023 39443.363 -5416.5 -.016 44823.482 -1760.5 -.157 39671.467 -5261.5 -.013 44846.430 -1745.0 -.019 39685.482 -5252.0 .022 45138.502 -1546.5 -.065 39819.380 -5161.0 .001 45556.496 -1262.5 -.012 40145.382 -4939.5 .038 45674.271 -1182.5 .032 40173.311 -4920.5 .006 45935.436 -1005.0 -.016 40201.260 -4901.5 -.005 45946.374 -997.5 -.115 40476.461 -4714.5 .002 46373.289 -707.5 .029 40501.442 -4697.5 -.035 46648.464 -520.5 .010 40504.426 -4695.5 .006 46704.350 -482.5 -.026 40749.496 -4529.0 .051 46707.346 -480.5 .027 40827.448 -4476.0 .006 47094.342 -217.5 -.015 40914.297 -4417.0 .029 47139.224 -187.0 -.017 41512.483 -4010.5 .000 It can be seen from the column O-C that the fit is very good. The secondary minimum agrees with the ephemeris too, i.e., the orbit is probably circular. The depths of the primary and secondary minima are 0.4m (in both colours) and 0.3m, respectively; the width of both is 0.14d. [FIGURE 1] Figure 1 O-C values for the star GS Cep. Dots ([dot]) represent photographic and crosses (+) photoelectric observations For many years, the times of minima have been reported as satisfactorily fitting the GCVS ephemeris [determined by Strohmeier et al. (1962)]. Mr. Lichtenknecker kindly sent us the list of all published photographic and visual minima. Some of these 58 minima do agree with our ephemeris - among them also one of two photographic minima observed by P. Frank (in Huebscher et al. 1989). Two of us (P.N. , P.H. ) estimated the brightness of the star on about 600 plates of the Sonneberg Observatory collection, and found 55 plates with a lower brightness than the rest. These times are listed in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 1 along with our measurements. With the exception of nine of them, they agree with the new ephemeris (O-C <= 0.050d). The older - mostly incorrect - visual data probably can be explained by the low amplitude of minima, which is not suitable for visual estimations. The original Bamberg data produced a rather suspicious light curve. The reason why it shows such a large amplitude ( 0.9m in the primary minimum) and why the period seemed well determined remains unknown. D. HANZL, P. NOVAK, P. HAJEK N. Copernicus Observatory and Planetarium Kravi Hora, 616 00 Brno Pavel MAYER Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Charles University Svedska 8, 150 00 Praha 5 Czechoslovakia References: Hanzl, D.: 1990, I.B.V.S., No. 3423. Huebscher, J., Lichtenknecker, D., Wunder, E.: 1989, BAV Mitt. 52. Strohmeier, W., Knigge, R., Ott, H.: 1962, Bamberg Veroff. 5, N. 15.