COMMISSION 27 OF THE I. A. U. INFORMATION BULLETIN ON VARIABLE STARS Number 3569 Konkoly Observatory Budapest 7 March 1991 HU ISSN 0374 - 0676 RECENT MINIMA AND IMPROVED EPHEMERIDES FOR THE ECLIPSING HOT SUBDWARFS LB3459 (=AA DOR) AND BD-7d3477 (=HW VIR) The hot sdOB star LB 3459 (=AA Dor) was discovered to be an eclipsing binary by Kilkenny et al. (1978) and has a rather short period of 6h17m. The parameters of the secondary star are not well known but it appears to be close to a degenerate configuration (Kudritzki et el 1982) and most of the visible light from the secondary is apparently reflected primary light. The sdB star BD-7d3477 (=HW Vir) was discovered to be an eclipsing binary by Menzies & Marang (1986) during a survey of UV-bright objects. It has a very short period (2h48m) and the secondary could be a red main-sequence star (Menzies & Marang 1986). Because of the evolved nature of the primary stars in these systems end the short periods, it seems highly likely that both could have passed through at least one "common envelope" stage (Paczynski 1980). Currently, both binaries appear to be detached so that mass exchange by Roche lobe overflow is not likely to be occurring. Angular momentum loss by gravitational radiation or by mass loss vie stellar winds would effect the periods; the former should only be measurable after ~10^2-10^3 years (see, e.g. Paczynski 1967) but the letter might be more effective. We have therefore made occasional observations of eclipses of both systems with a view to establishing very accurate ephemerides to test for period changes. The most recent ephemerides for AA Dor and HW Vir have been given by Kilkenny (1986) end Marang & Kilkenny (1989) respectively. The new timings of primary minima together with estimated errors are listed in Table 1, where the cycle numbers ,n, are determined from the above mentioned ephemerides. All observations were made with the 1.0m and 0.5m telescopes at the Sutherland site of the South African Astronomical Observatory. Various filters were used (see Table 1) with 20- or 30-second continuous integrations to obtain the eclipse curves. Sky measures were made before and after eclipse and usually near mid- eclipse; the sky corrections were then interpolated for all eclipse date. The results for HW Vir are more accurate than those for AA Dor, probably due to the fact that HW Vir is rather brighter than AA Dor and that the latter is a foreground LMC object which means a smaller aperture is necessary and so scintillation and guiding effects are more serious. Combining the new eclipse timings with published results, we obtain for HW Vir: T_min = 244 5730.556071 + 0.1167196336n +-0.000014 +-0.0000000017 from 34 eclipses. T_min is the time of primary mid-eclipse and the errors are formal errors from a linear least-squares fit to the times of mid-eclipse. For AA Dor we obtain T_min = 244 3196.348685 + 0.2615397198n +-0.000016 +-0.0000000017 from 27 eclipses. The eight timings between cycles 1000 and 4000 are excluded from the linear least squares solution because these were either multicolour (uvby) and therefore of much poorer time resolution or were of poor quality. Including these data in the solution makes almost no difference to the ephemeris coefficients but does make the errors significantly worse. TABLE 1 New timings of primary minima HJD Est.error n Filter Tel AA Dor 2446795.39692 +- 0.00005 13761 V 1.0m (=LB3459) 6801.41230 0.00005 13784 V 1.0 7121.53695 0.00010 15008 y 1.0 7850.44822 0.00005 17795 V 1.0 8267.34250 0.00003 19389 V 1.0 HW Vir 2447968.53836 +- 0.00002 19174 B 0.5m (=BD-7d3477) 7972.50682 0.00002 19208 B 1.0 8267.57410 0.00002 21736 V 1.0 [FIGURE 1] Fig. 1. (O-C) diagrams for AA Dor and HW Vir basd on the ephemerides determined in this paper. The AA Dor data were obtained between 1977 and 1991; the HW Vir data between 1984 and 1991. Figure 1 shows the (O-C) residuals for both binaries. In the case of AA Dor, the linear fit is very good and there is no evidence for period change. For HW Vir there is a weak indication in the most recent data that the linear fit may not be good enough. It is unfortunate that no observations of HW Vir were made during 1986-1989 and it is clear that further data are very desirable. D. KILKENNY, M. HARROP-ALLIN, F. MARANG South African Astronomical Observatory PO Box 9, Observatory 7935, S. Africa References: Kilkenny, D., Hilditch, R.W. & Penfold, J.E., 1978. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 183, 523. [BIBCODE 1978MNRAS.183..523K ] Kilkenny, D., 1986. Observatory 106, 160. [BIBCODE 1986Obs...106..160K ] Kudritzki, R.P., Simon, K.P., Lynas-Gray, A.E., Kilkenny, D. & Hill, P.W., 1982. Astr. Astrophys., 106, 254. [BIBCODE 1982A&A...106..254K ] Marang, F. & Kilkenny, D., 1989. Inf. Bull. Var. Star, 3390. Menzies, J.W. & Marang, F., 1986. IAU Symposium 118, 305. [BIBCODE 1986IAUS..118..305M ] Paczynski, B., 1967. Acta. Astr., 17, 287. [BIBCODE 1967AcA....17..287P ] Paczynski, B., 1980. Acta. Astr., 30, 113. [BIBCODE 1980AcA....30..113P ]