COMMISSION 27 OF THE I. A. U. INFORMATION BULLETIN ON VARIABLE STARS Number 1638 Konkoly Observatory Budapest 1979 July 10 ON THE PERIOD AND VELOCITY CURVE OF THE BETA CEPHEI STAR HR6684 In a recent paper McNamara (1978) derived a velocity curve for the beta Cep star HR6684 (=HD 163472) that differs considerably from those obtained by Pike (1374,1978) and Bolton, Percy and Shemilt (1975, hereafter BPS). McNamara does not consider the differences in velocity amplitude to be real, though he does suggest that his observations indicate some asymmetry in the velocity curve. The purpose of this note is to show that the differences found by McNamara are due to the method of analysis and the use of a slightly incorrect period. Inspection of Figure 1 of McNamara (1978) shows that the sinusoidal velocity curve has been fit to the data assuming the descending branch crosses the gamma-velocity at the time of maximum light predicted by the ephemeris of Morton and Hansen (1974), Max.light= JD_hel 2441442.048 + 0.1398903d*E. BPS showed that this is the correct relationship between the light and velocity curves. However, McNamara's velocities were obtained almost 58.000 cycles before the epoch of the light ephemeris, so even a small error in the period could produce a substantial phase shift between the true and computed ephemerides. I have fitted sine curves to all three sets of radial velocity data with the gamma-velocity, amplitude, and time of maximum radial velocity as free parameters. The results are given in Table I. Table I Element McNamara Pike BPS V_0 (km/s) -16.6(4) 0.2(6) -15.5(3) K (km/s) 7.2(8) 8.2(11) 8.8(5) T(JD_hel2400000+) 33332.92116(3) 42225.6705(2) 42229.74375(8) epsilon (km/s) 2.5 3.8 1.4 O-C (d) -0.08876 -0.008 +0.00844 n (cycles) -57968 +5602 +5631 V_0 is the gamma-velocity, K the velocity semi-amplitude, T the JD_hel of maximum velocity, epsilon the RMS scatter about the fitted curves, O-C difference between the observed and predicted time of maximum velocity according to the ephemeris of Morton and Hansen, and n is the number of cycles elapsed between the epoch of the ephemeris and the epoch of the observations. The standard errors of the fitted quantities in the sense of the uncertainty in the last digit quoted are given in parentheses following the parameters. I have used the measures from Pike (1978) rather than the earlier measures Pike (1974). This accounts for the widely discrepant gamma-velocity for this data set. None of the velocity curves show any evidence of asymmetry, and there is excellent agreement among the velocity semi-amplitudes. If we ignore the velocity curve of Pike, which was obtained only 4 days before that of BPS and is of much lower accuracy, then the O-C's indicate that the period given by Morton and Hansen should be increased by 1.53 x 10^-6 day to 0.13989183d. C.T. BOLTON David Dunlap Observatory P.O. Box 360 Richmond Hill, Ontario Canada L4C 4Y6 References: Bolton, C.T., Percy, J.R., and Shemilt, R.E. 1975, Pub.A.S.P., 87, 595 (BPS) [BIBCODE 1975PASP...87..595B ] McNamara, D.H. 1978, Pub.A.S.P., 90, 96 [BIBCODE 1978PASP...90...96M ] Morton, A.E. and Hansen, H.K. 1974, Pub.A.S.P., 86, 943 [BIBCODE 1974PASP...86..943M ] Pike, C.D. 1974, Pub.A.S.P., 86, 681 [BIBCODE 1974PASP...86..681P ] Pike, C.D. 1978, Mon.Not. R.A.S., 184, 265 [BIBCODE 1978MNRAS.184..265P ]