COMMISSION 27 OF THE I. A. U. INFORMATION BULLETIN ON VARIABLE STARS NUMBER 500 Konkoly Observatory Budapest 1970 December 28 A NEW LARGE AMPLITUDE ECLIPSING STAR In 1966, while examining variables in the Scutum Star Cloud, V. M. Swain discovered this eclipsing binary at 18h43m11s, -5deg49.1' (1900), It is identified as v in Fig. 1, where the comparison stars are also marked: a = 14.87, b = 15.01, c = 15.60, d = 15.79, e = 16.82, f = 17.08, g = 17.74, h = 18.03, k = 18.30, m = 18.53. [FIGURE 1] Though of photographic magnitude 15.3 at maximum this star faded below the limit of the 110 24-inch Bruce plates she inspected. In the autumn of 1966, Evered Kreimer obtained 13 useable negatives during two minima with a cold-emulsion camera and a 12.5-inch reflector, which he has described (1). Though the images of the variable were very weak at mid-minimum, they indicated a range of about three magnitudes and confirmed the period of 4.1 days. Fortunately this star was visible near mid-minimum on four of 50 plates taken by A. Sandage with the 48-inch Palomar Schmidt and made available to M. Harwood. From this latter material, the minimum magnitude of the eclipsing binary was determined to be 18.5, from the Kron Harwood (2) and the photometric standards for NGC 6712 given by Sandage and Smith (3). Since 10-minute exposures were used by Kreimer and Sandage, little smearing of the light curve during primary eclipse should be present. However, the Bruce exposures were several times longer and were given half weight in forming the normal points of primary eclipse (b = 0.3060 to b = 0.4284 in Table I); it was also necessary to subtract 0.13 magnitude from these estimates to remove a systematic difference. The Kreimer results were not used at all to form the light curve, since his exposures were on panchromatic film instead of a blue-sensitive emulsion. [FIGURE 2] The points in Fig. 2 denote the following: large dots, the average of more than five estimates; small dots: the average of five or fewer estimates; open circles: normal points from the reflected observations. These data are summarized in Table I, where n indicates the number of estimates and MP the mean phase computed from MP = p^-1 (JD - 2420000). Table I. MP m n MP m n .0513 15.25 24 .3542/.3802 17.96 3 .1307 16.24 9 .3645/.3699 18.49 3 .2594 15.23 13 .4701 15.27 5 .3060/.4284 15.28 5 .5615 15.28 22 .3185/.4179 15.41 2 .9473 15.28 18 .3261/.4083 15.72 5 :7554 16.22 4 .3328/.4018 16.18 3 .8419 15.30 24 .3376/.3968 16.51 5 .9276 15.26 8 .3412/.3932 16.86 5 The eclipses last 0.144p = 14.2h and are total with a duration of 0.016p = 1.6h. The mean light curve during primary eclipse was fitted to the individual observations to obtain the four normal times of minima in Table II. The first two Table II. JD Hel. E O-C 2 428 198.598 -636 +.001d 28 894.378 -487 -.003 35 284.072 +1065 +.001 39 401.140 +2065 +.001 are from Bruce plates, the third from 48-inch Schmidt plates, and the last from Kreimer's negatives. The following elements were derived: JD min. hel. = 2430899.394 + 4.117068d E. L. J. ROBINSON M. HARWOOD V. M. SWAIN Cambridge, Mass. USA (1) John H. Mallas and Evered Kreimer, Sky and Telescope 33, 285, 1967. (2) Margaret Harwood, Leiden Annals XXI, 387, 1962. [BIBCODE 1960AnLei..21..387H ] (3) Allan Sandage and Lewis L. Smith, ApJ 144, 886, 1966. [BIBCODE 1966ApJ...144..886S ]