COMMISSION 27 OF THE I. A. U. INFORMATION BULLETIN ON VARIABLE STARS NUMBER 457 Konkoly Observatory Budapest 1970 July 27 AUTOCORRELATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGHT OF DQ Her, UX UMa AND RW Tri Photoelectric observations of exnovae and similar stars were repeatedly analysed by means of statistical methods (1,2). These analyses were usually carried of observations obtained during a few hours. The results of the autocorrelative analysis of the light variations of DQ Her (3,4), UX UMa (5,3) and RW Tri (7) are given in the present paper. They were obtained by the method described in (8), which can be applied to series with gaps. A unite correlative shift is equal to 0d0001. The maximum shift equals 0d01. For each of the three variables the analysis was performed twice: for all the observations and for observations that do not include eclipses. In the first case the autocorrelative function (r) essentially refers to the eclipse because of much larger disposition of light variations owing to eclipse. The function obtained is close to a harmonic with a period near to the duration of the eclipse. The autocorrelative analysis of the observations outside eclipses gives the autocorrelative function of that component of the binary which has a larger light dispersion. DQ Her: On Fig.1. (a,b) dots show r for two parts of the series of V observations. The dashed curves are cosinusoids with period of P = 0d06. freed from the stochastic light variations the eclipse is the same for both parts of the series. On Fig.1 (c,d) the values if r were obtained after exclusion of the eclipses for V and U observations. The dashed curves are exponentials with relaxation times of 0d02 and 0d0074 for V and U bands, respectively. In addition to the know harmonic variation with the period 71s71 _+0s68 (9) the autocorrelative analysis for DQ Her also reveals a pure stochastic light variation. The relaxation time of this stochastic process is larger for radiations of longer wave length. UX UMa: On Fig.2 (a,b,c) dots show values of r for UBV series including eclipses. Dashed curves are cosinusoids with periods of 0d040 and 0d037. The eclipse in U is shorter. This is an argument in favour of the nonatmospheric nature of the eclipses. The difference between the eclipse durations may be caused by larger limb darkening on the brighter component in the U band. Curves d and e of Fig.2 represent values of r for UX UMa outside eclipses for V and B, respectively. The dashed curves are exponentials with [FIGURE 1] relaxations times of 0d025 and 0d0056. As well for DQ Her the light variations outside the eclipses possesses a longer relaxation time for radiation of longer wave lengths. RW Tri: On Fig.3 (a) dots show values of the r for V observations including eclipses. The dashed curve is a cosinusoid with P = 0d05. On Fig.3 (b) dots show the r values outside eclipses. The dashed curve is an exponential with a relaxation time of 0d055. It refers to the light variations of that component or a gas nebula which are uneclipsed in the primary minimum. That follows from increase of the eclipse [FIGURE 2] depth with decrease of brightness of RW Tri according to Walker (7). The 60s-period of RW Tri that was pointed out previously (9), seems hardly real. Its appearance may be likely accounted for the that observations (7) were carried out in intervals of the [FIGURE 3] multiples of 1 minute. Pugach obtained during two hours about 600 observations of RW Tri using the counting technique. There was not and evidence of the 60 s period. Therefore, the three variables have stochastic components in their light variations. The autocorrelation functions of these stochastic processes are exponentials. Their relaxation times are equal to some thousandths of a day in B and decrease with wave length. It is interesting that r for B observations of Sco X-1, which has the spectrum of an exnova, is also an exponential with relaxation time of 0d3 (10). F.I. LUKATSKAYA and A.F. PUGACH Main Astronomical Observatory Kiev Literature: [REFERENCES] (1) G. Mumford 1967, PASP 79, 283 [BIBCODE 1967PASP...79..283M ] (2) G. Lawrence et al. 1968, ApJ 148, part 2, 161 [BIBCODE 1967ApJ...148L.161L ] (3) M. Walker 1956, ApJ 123, 68 [BIBCODE 1956ApJ...123...68W ] (4) M. Walker 1958, ApJ 127, 319 [BIBCODE 1958ApJ...127..319W ] (5) M. Walker, G. Herbig 1954, ApJ 120, N2 [BIBCODE 1954ApJ...120..278W ] (6) W. Krzeminski, M. Walker 1963, ApJ 138, 146 [BIBCODE 1963ApJ...138..146K ] (7) M. Walker 1963, ApJ 137, 485 [BIBCODE 1963ApJ...137..485W ] (8) F. I. Lukatskaya 1967, Perem.Zv. (Russ) 16, N2 (9) A.F. Pugach 1970, IBVS Com. 27 IAU, N418 [IBVS 418] (10) F.I. Lukatskaya et al. 1969, AC USSR, N512 [BIBCODE 1969ATsir.512....7L ]